-
Ancelotti questioned as Real Madrid face Alaves
-
Old foes Bayern and Dortmund face off amid spectre of European exit
-
Early holiday, more fans: Philippines schools adapt to climate change
-
In skies, as on land, European forces face gaps if US pulls back
-
Digital divas: Can Japan's virtual YouTuber craze crack America?
-
WHO pandemic agreement talks face deadline crunch
-
Stocks, dollar sink and gold hits record as Trump tariff panic returns
-
LeMond hails 'one in a million' Pogacar ahead of Paris-Roubaix debut
-
Liverpool can move closer to the title as top five tension mounts
-
Trump admits trade war 'cost' as markets hit
-
AI only just beginning to revolutionize the NBA game
-
Despite Trump pause, overall US tariff rate at highest in a century
-
'A pain that doesn't subside' at funerals for Dominican nightclub disaster victims
-
Panama deal allows US to deploy troops to canal
-
US firm says it brought back extinct dire wolves
-
Grieving Dominicans start burying 220 victims of nightclub disaster
-
Aberg closes strong at 'sneaky hard' Augusta National
-
US auto union praises some Trump tariffs
-
Australian IVF clinic admits embryo mix-up
-
Rose: I've played well enough to win Masters but lack the jacket
-
Rose again enjoys 'luxury' of first-round Masters lead
-
Rose rockets to Masters lead, defending champ Scheffler in pursuit
-
Tesla opens first showroom in oil-rich Saudi
-
Oscars to add new award for stunts
-
Hatton loves being at Masters but 'It's just so hard'
-
'Mistakes can happen': Amorim backs Onana after Lyon nightmare
-
RFK Jr says study will reveal cause of autism 'epidemic'
-
Tourist family, pilot killed in 'tragic' NY helicopter crash
-
No.1 Scheffler makes strong Masters start to defend title
-
Man Utd and Spurs draw in Europa League, Rangers hold Athletic
-
Rose rockets to Masters lead with Scheffler and McIlroy in pursuit
-
Man Utd held late in Lyon after Onana errors in Europa League
-
Man Utd held late in Lyon after Onana errors
-
Wall Street rally fizzles as tariff fears resurface
-
MLS to open 'second phase' of major season overhaul study
-
Argentina braves 24-hour strike as it awaits word on IMF loan
-
Spain's Ballester finds relief in Masters water hazard
-
Porro rescues Postecoglou as Spurs held by Frankfurt
-
Grieving Dominicans start burying 200+ victims of nightclub disaster
-
CONMEBOL proposes one-off 64-team World Cup in 2030
-
Rybakina on form for Kazakhstan in BJK Cup
-
Former Real Madrid coach Leo Beenhakker dies aged 82
-
Rose rockets to top of Masters leaderboard, Scheffler one back
-
Langer fades after fiery start in Masters farewell
-
Iran, US raise stakes ahead of key talks in Oman
-
US-China confrontation overshadows Trump's 'beautiful' trade war
-
RFK, MLK assassination files to be released in 'next few days'
-
Relevent settle anti-trust lawsuit with US Soccer
-
Orcas, dolphins stuck in closed French marine park
-
Rahul shines as Delhi bag fourth straight win in IPL
China, Trump, and the power of war?
As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.
Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions
Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.
Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.
Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.
The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response
Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.
Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.
Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.
Potential Military Scenarios
Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.
Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.
Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.
Risks and Global Ramifications
Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.
Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.
International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.
Diplomatic Alternatives
Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.
Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.
In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.

Next Generation EU a scam?

Can Poland Rescue Europe?

Finance’s Role in Economic Ruin

Trump’s Tariffs Spark Global Fear

Georgia Slips into Russia’s Grasp

Trump’s Ukraine Economic Colony Plan Stirs Debate

China Targets Dollar at US Critical Moment

EU Pledges €800 Billion for Defence to Deter Russia

Israel escalates War to crush Hamas

Trump, Putin and the question: What now?

Canada challenges Trump on Tariffs
